VIRGINIA RULES ANNOTATED
Copyright (c) 1982-2000 by LEXIS Law Publishing,
A Division of Reed Elsevier Inc. and
Reed Elsevier Properties Inc.
All rights reserved.
* THIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENT THROUGH CHANGES RECEIVED AS OF MARCH 1, 2001 *
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA
PART SIX. INTEGRATION OF THE STATE BAR
SECTION IV. ORGANIZATION AND GOVERNMENT.
Va. Sup. Ct. Organ. and Gov. PARA 13
(2001)
Review Court Orders which may amendthis Rule
13. Procedure for Disciplining, Suspending, and Disbarring
Attorneys.
A. Definitions. - As used in this Rule (Paragraph), the following terms shall
have the meaning herein stated unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
"Admonition" means a determination by the Board and
"Private Reprimand" means a determination by a District Committee that misconduct has been
established but that no substantial harm to the Complainant or the public has
occurred and that no further disciplinary action is necessary.
"Attorney" means a member of the Virginia State Bar, any other
attorney admitted to regular or limited practice in this State, and any member of the
bar of any other jurisdiction while engaged, pro hac vice or otherwise, in the
practice of law in Virginia.
"Bar" means the Virginia State Bar.
"Bar Counsel" means an
attorney who, together with such assistants as may be required, is appointed as Bar
Counsel, subject to the approval of the
Attorney General pursuant to 2.1-122(c) of the Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended, by the Council of the Bar.
"Board" means the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board appointed as hereinafter
provided.
"Charge of Misconduct" means the notice given by the bar to the Respondent, setting forth the
Misconduct alleged to have been committed by the Respondent, and the rules of
conduct alleged to have been violated.
"Clerk of the Disciplinary System" means that employee of the Virginia State Bar who, together with such
assistants as may be required, provides administrative support to the
disciplinary system and serves as official keeper of the Bar's disciplinary
records.
"Complainant" means the initiator of a Complaint.
"Complaint" means any oral or written communication to the Bar alleging Misconduct or from
which allegations of Misconduct reasonably may be inferred.
"Committee Counsel" means a District Committee member assigned to conduct or oversee the
investigation of a Complaint.
"Council" means the Council of the Bar.
"Crime" means:
(a) any offense declared to be a felony
by federal or state law;
(b) any other offense, whether federal or state, involving theft, fraud,
forgery, extortion, bribery, or perjury; or
(c) an attempt, solicitation or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing.
"Disability" means: (a) the status of being a drug addict, an alcoholic, or mentally ill as
those terms are defined in 37.1-1 of the Code of Virginia; or
(b) any physical or mental condition that materially impairs the fitness of an
Attorney to practice law.
"Disciplinary Record" means any record of any proceeding in which the Respondent has been found
guilty of Misconduct, including those proceedings in which (1) the Board's or
Court's finding of Misconduct has been appealed to the Supreme Court of
Virginia; (2) the Respondent has surrendered his license to practice law or has
been found guilty of a Crime; or (3) the Respondent has received a sanction
pursuant to paragraph 13.K.(1).
"Disciplinary Record" shall also include those cases in which a Charge of
Misconduct has been (1) dismissed with Terms; (2) dismissed for exceptional
circumstances; or (3) dismissed upon a finding that the alleged or questioned
Misconduct is not of sufficient magnitude to warrant disciplinary action and
the Respondent has taken reasonable precautions against a recurrence of the
same Misconduct.
"District Committee" means one of the District Committees appointed as hereinafter provided or,
where the context requires, a panel thereof.
"Executive Director" means the Executive Director of the Bar and any assistant designated by
Council to act in his stead.
"Judge" means a person within the definition of judge contained in 2.1-37.1 of the
Code of Virginia.
"Misconduct" means:
(a) any unlawful conduct, as described in 54.1-3935 of the Code of Virginia;
(b) any violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct or the Code of
Professional Responsibility; or
(c) conviction of a criminal offense, other than a Crime as defined herein,
which reflects
upon the fitness of an
Attorney to practice law.
"Public Reprimand" means a determination that Misconduct has been established, but that the
nature of such Misconduct and its consequent harm to the Complainant or the
public, though substantial, does not justify the more severe sanction of
suspension or revocation of the Respondent's license.
"Respondent" shall mean any
Attorney against whom a Complaint has been made or who is the subject of any proceeding
under this Paragraph 13.
"Revocation" shall include revocation of an
Attorney's license (a) by the Board whether for Misconduct, Crime, Disability or
suspension or revo-cation in another jurisdiction, or (b) by a court, whether
pursuant to Paragraph 13.1. or Va. Code 54.1-3935.
"Standing Committee" means the Standing Committee on Lawyer Discipline created and appointed under
Article VIII, Section 3 of the Bylaws of the Virginia State Bar and Council.
"Subcommittee" means a Subcommittee of the District Committee or any Panel thereof,
consisting of (i) the District Committee member appointed by the District Committee Chairman
to act as chairman pro tempore, (ii) a non-lawyer member of the District
Committee, and (iii) a lawyer member, which is convened for the purpose of
performing the functions described in subsection (B)(5) of this Paragraph 13.
"Terms" shall mean those conditions imposed by the Subcommittee, District Committee or
Disciplinary Board on the Respondent, by which the Respondent is required to
perform certain remedial actions as a condition predicate for the dismissal of
a Complaint or the imposition of an Admonition, or a private or public
reprimand, under such rules as are prescribed by Council.
B. Authority and Duties of the Council, the Standing Committee, Subcommittees,
District Committees and Bar Counsel; Investigation and Prosecution of
Complaints:
(1) The Council shall have general administrative authority over and
responsibility for the disciplinary system created pursuant to this
Paragraph 13; provided, however, that the Council shall have no authority over
the Board, nor shall the Council have authority over a District Committee
exercising its adjudicative powers under this Rule. Council shall appoint
District Committees as provided herein and shall prescribe uniform rules of
procedure for the District Committees. All such powers and duties of Council
may be exercised by the Standing Committee, subject to direction and control of
the Council, except the power to appoint District Committees and prescribe
rules of procedure.
(2) Appointment of Committees, Panels and Subcommittees:
(a) Council shall appoint a sufficient number of District Committees to carry
out the intent of this Paragraph 13. District Committees shall be appointed
from geographical areas consisting of one or more judicial circuits. In
creating the District Committee areas, Council shall give due consideration to
attorney population and the community of interest among
different judicial circuits within a District Committee area.
(b) Each member of a District Committee shall be a resident of or have his or
her office in the District Committee area for which he or she is appointed.
Members shall, to the extent practicable, be appointed from different
geographical sections of their districts.
(c) Council shall appoint members of each District Committee for such terms of
service as will allow for the retirement from the Committee or completion of
the existing terms of one-third (1/3) of the Committee membership at the end of
each fiscal year. A District Committee member's term shall be for three (3)
years, and, upon completion of such term, such member is eligible for
appointment to a second successive three (3) year term. A member who has served
two (2) full successive terms of three (3) years each on a District
Committee shall not be eligible to serve again until one (1) year after the
expiration of his or her second term.
(d) Each District Committee shall consist of ten, or in the discretion of
Council, twenty, thirty or forty members. Further, former members of a District
Committee may serve on a District Committee Subcommittee or participate in a
District Committee hearing whenever the District Committee Chairman determines
that such service is necessary for the orderly administration of the District
Committee's work. Three members of a ten-member District Committee, six members
of a twenty-member District Committee, nine members of a thirty-member District
Committee, and twelve members of a forty-member District Committee shall be
non-lawyers. If a District Committee consists of twenty members or more, ten
members designated
by the Council or District Committee Chairman, or as otherwise designated
pursuant to this Paragraph 13, shall become a panel and may act on matters
which come before it. A quorum shall consist of five persons. One person
assigned to a District Committee or Panel shall be a present or former
non-lawyer member of either the District Committee before which the proceeding
is held or a present or former member of any other District Committee. If the
scheduled non-lawyer person is unable to attend, and if an alternate non-lawyer
is not reasonably available, participation by non-lawyer members shall not be
required in a proceeding if a quorum is otherwise present. The action of a
majority of a quorum shall be the action of the District Committee or Panel.
There shall also be one or more Subcommittees of each District Committee,
appointed by the Chair thereof. Where a
District Committee is divided into two or more panels, there shall be one or
more Subcommittees of each panel, as determined by the District Committee
Chairman. A quorum of a Subcommittee shall consist of all three members, who
may act in person or through any means of communication.
(3) Authority and Duties of Bar Counsel:To the extent provided in this rule and
subject to the general supervision of the Standing Committee, Bar Counsel shall
initiate, investigate, present or prosecute Complaints or other proceedings
before Subcommittees, District Committees, the Board and the Circuit Courts. In
the course of performing these functions, Bar Counsel shall act independently
and exercise prosecutorial autonomy and discretion. This includes, but is not
limited to, the authority to examine criminal history record information
relating to any Respondent from any state or federal law enforcement agency,
and to examine the financial books and records maintained by an
attorney
for the practice of law, including, without limitation, any and all trust
accounts, estate accounts, fiduciary accounts and operating accounts maintained
by the
attorney or his/her law firm. Bar Counsel may also examine an
attorney's trust account whenever Bar Counsel reasonably believes that the trust account
may not be in compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct or the Code of
Professional Responsibility. In the exercise of this authority, Bar Counsel may
issue such summonses or subpoenas as he/she may reasonably deem necessary for
the effective conduct of an investigation or an examination of an
attorney's trust account. In every case in which Bar Counsel initiates examination of an
attorney's trust account or issues any summonses or subpoenas in the conduct of an
examination of or an investigation concerning an
attorney's trust account, other than on the basis of a Complaint against the
attorney, Bar Counsel shall file a written statement as part of the
record in the case setting forth the reasons supporting his/her belief that the
subject trust account may not be in compliance with the Rules of Professional
Conduct or the Code of Professional Responsibility. A copy of this written
statement shall be delivered to the
attorney whose trust account is the subject of the investigation when an examination is
begun or any summons or subpoena is issued.
(4) Authority and Duties of District Committees; Jurisdiction; Venue:
(a) The principal duty of a District Committee shall be to consider, adjudicate
and make disposition of Complaints filed with the District Committee pursuant
to this Rule. Where appropriate, the District Committee or Subcommittee shall
also counsel with Respondents about their conduct. In addition, members of a
District Committee, other than non-lawyer members, may participate in the
investigation of Complaints, provided that a member participating in such
investigation shall not participate in a District Committee's consideration,
adjudication and
disposition of such Complaint.
(b) A District Committee shall have jurisdiction over all Complaints filed with
it against any Respondent. Venue shall not be jurisdictional, but venue shall
lie in the following order of preference in any district where:
(i) any portion of the alleged Misconduct occurred; or
(ii) the Respondent resides; or
(iii) the Respondent maintains an office; or
(iv) the address of the Respondent on record with the Virginia State Bar as the
Respondent's address for licensing purposes lies.
If preferred venue does not lie with any District Committee able to adjudicate
the Complaint against a Respondent, such Complaint may be filed with and
adjudicated by a District Committee designated by the Clerk of the Disciplinary
System. In determining to which committee a Complaint should be referred, the
Clerk shall consider the volume of Complaints pending before the District
Committee and the inconvenience imposed upon the Respondent and the witnesses
by the location of the committee.
Either the Respondent or Bar Counsel may object to venue by filing a Notice of
Objection with the Clerk of the Disciplinary System within ten days of
notification by the Clerk of the referral of the Complaint to a District
Committee. Objections to venue shall be deemed waived unless made within this
ten day time period. Upon receipt of a timely filed Notice of Objection, the
Clerk shall forward the Notice of Objection to the Chairman of the Board, whose
decision on the matter shall be final.
(c) Subject to the rules of procedure prescribed by Council, each District
Committee shall have the power:
(i) to elect a chairman, vice-chairman, secretary and assistant secretary and
such other officers as it considers appropriate;
(ii) to conduct hearings and adjudicate Charges of Misconduct as provided in
this Rule;
(iii) to summon and examine witnesses under oath administered by any member of
the District
Committee and to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of
documents necessary or material to any inquiry; and
(iv) to rule on the admissibility of evidence. Any summons or subpoena may be
issued on behalf of a District Committee by any lawyer member thereof or by Bar
Counsel.
(5) Investigations: (a) Complaints Unrelated to the Virginia Rules of
Professional Conduct or the Virginia Code of Professional Responsibility: - All
Complaints of Misconduct filed with the Virginia State Bar shall be reviewed by
Bar Counsel. If, following review of the Complaint, Bar Counsel determines that
the conduct questioned or alleged does not present an issue under the Virginia
Rules of Professional Conduct or the Virginia Code of Professional
Responsibility, Bar Counsel shall not open an investigative file.
(b) Informal or Abbreviated Investigations: - When Bar Counsel determines to
open an investigative file, he or she may decide if the Complaint is
appropriate for an informal or abbreviated investigation. It is contemplated
that this type of investigation would be
generally appropriate when the Complaint of Misconduct involves less serious
allegations of Misconduct. Bar Counsel may assign such a Complaint to a staff
member, a District Committee member, or use any other means practicable to
speedily investigate and conclude the allegation of Misconduct. If the
Complaint is resolved through this process to the satisfaction of the
Complainant, the Respondent and the Bar, Bar Counsel shall then dismiss the
Complaint. Such dismissal shall not become part of the Respondent's
Disciplinary Record. In the event Bar Counsel chooses not to proceed under this
subsection (b) or, having elected to proceed under this subsection (b), the
Complaint is not resolved within ninety days from the date of filing the
Complaint, Bar Counsel shall proceed pursuant to subsection (c), below.
(c) Preliminary Investigation and Filing of a Complaint with the District
Committee and Action by Subcommittee: -
(i) Bar Counsel shall conduct
a preliminary investigation of any Complaint to determine whether the same
should be filed with a District Committee. Bar Counsel shall decline filing a
Complaint with a District Committee following a preliminary investigation when,
in Bar Counsel's judgment:
(a) As a matter of law, the conduct questioned or alleged does not constitute
Misconduct;
(b) The evidence available shows that the Respondent did not engage in the
Misconduct questioned or alleged;
(c) There is no credible evidence to support any allegation of Misconduct by
the Respondent; or
(d) The evidence available could not reasonably be expected to support any
allegation of Misconduct under a
"clear and convincing" evidentiary standard.
When filing a Complaint with a District Committee, Bar Counsel shall notify the
District Committee Chairman thereof of Bar Counsel's recommendation that the
matter be investigated by a member of Bar Counsel's staff, by a District
Committee member or both. The District Committee Chairman shall promptly notify
Bar Counsel of any disagreement with Bar Counsel's recommendation. If Bar
Counsel and the District Committee Chairman are unable to agree, the Standing
Committee or member thereof serving as its designee, shall determine by whom
the investigation is to be conducted. Thereafter, in accordance with procedural
rules established by the Council, the Complaint shall be investigated and a
report thereof made to the Subcommittee.
(ii) Action by the Subcommittee: - When submitting a Report of Investigation to
the Subcommittee, Bar Counsel or Committee Counsel shall include a
recommendation as to the appropriate disposition of the Complaint and shall
indicate any agreement with the Respondent with respect to such recommendation.
Following receipt of the report, the Subcommittee shall:
(a) refer the matter to Bar Counsel for further investigation; or
(b) dismiss the Complaint with or without Terms; provided, however, that if the
Subcommittee dismisses the Complaint with Terms and the Respondent fails to
comply with such Terms, the
Subcommittee shall set the Complaint for a hearing before the District
Committee; and provided further that a respondent, within ten days of the
issuance of the dismissal, may request a hearing before the District Committee
whenever the dismissal creates a
"Disciplinary Record," as that term is defined in /P13.A., supra; or
(c) certify the Complaint to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Subsection
(12), infra, or file a complaint in a circuit court, pursuant to Section
54.1-3935, Va. Code, 1950 as amended. Certification hereunder shall be based on
a reasonable belief that the Respondent has engaged or is engaged in Misconduct
which, if proved, would justify a suspension or revocation of Respondent's
license to practice law; or
(d) impose one of the following conditions or sanctions:
i. a private reprimand, with or without Terms;
ii. a public reprimand, with or without
Terms; or (e) set the Complaint for hearing before the District Committee.
Notwithstanding any other provision of these Rules, any member of the
Subcommittee may require that the Complaint be set for hearing.
No action under (ii)(d) above shall be taken by the Subcommittee except by
unanimous vote and with the concurrence of both Bar Counsel and Respondent.
In any case where Terms are included in the disposition, the Subcommittee shall
specify the time period within which compliance shall be completed and the
alternative disposition in the event the Terms are not complied with. Bar
Counsel shall be responsible for monitoring compliance with Terms and reporting
any noncompliance to the Subcommittee. If the Respondent fails to comply with
the Terms within the stated time period, as determined by the Subcommittee, the
alternative disposition shall be imposed.
All Subcommittee actions shall be reported to the District Committee as
provided in the Rules of Procedure adopted by the
Council.
(6) Procedures for District Committee Hearings: -
(a) Notice of Hearing: - If the Subcommittee determines that a hearing should
be held before a District Committee, Bar Counsel shall at least twenty-one days
prior to the date fixed for the hearing, serve upon the Respondent by certified
mail a notice of the hearing. The notice, called the Charge of Misconduct
throughout the remainder of this /P13, shall contain a statement of the time
and place designated by the District Committee for the hearing, a clear and
concise statement of the alleged Misconduct and any disciplinary rules alleged
to have been violated.
(b) Procedure at Hearing: - The hearing shall be conducted as an adversary
proceeding before a District Committee. The District Committee shall hear
witnesses and receive witnesses. The Charges of Misconduct shall be prosecuted
by Bar Counsel or Committee Counsel. The Respondent may be represented
by counsel, may cause witnesses and documents to be summonsed and subpoenaed by
the District Committee, and may cross-examine witnesses. The testimony shall be
taken and preserved, together with all exhibits (or copies thereof) received in
evidence or refused by the District Committee. At the conclusion of the
evidence of the Bar and at the conclusion of all the evidence, a motion to
strike the evidence of the Bar as to some or all charges may be made on behalf
of the Respondent. If the motion is sustained, the charges not supported by the
evidence shall be dismissed.
(c) Determination by District Committee: - At the conclusion of the hearing, if
the District Committee determines that the evidence fails to show Misconduct by
the Respondent, it shall dismiss the proceeding.
If the District Committee determines that the evidence shows Misconduct by the
Respondent, the District Committee Chairman shall issue its determination in
writing, setting forth the following:
(i) brief findings of the facts established by the evidence; and
(ii) the nature of the
Misconduct shown by the facts so established, including any disciplinary rules
violated by the Respondent; and
(iii) the disposition made by the District Committee.
The writing shall constitute the
"District Committee's Determination" for purposes of further proceedings under this Rule.
(7) Disposition: - Upon a finding of Misconduct a District Committee may:
(a) dismiss with specified Terms;
(b) impose a private reprimand, with or without Terms;
(c) impose a public reprimand, with or without Terms; or
(d) certify the Charges of Misconduct to the Board or file a complaint in a
circuit court, pursuant to 54.1-3935, Va. Code, 1950, as amended.
In any case where Terms are included in the disposition, the District Committee
shall specify the time period within which compliance shall be completed and
the alternative disposition in the event the Terms are not complied with. Bar
Counsel shall be responsible for monitoring compliance with Terms and reporting
any non-compliance to the District Committee. If the Respondent fails to comply
with the Terms within the stated time period, as determined by the District
Committee, the alternative disposition shall be imposed.
(8) Notice to Respondent and Bar Counsel: - The District Committee Chairman by
certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, shall promptly notify
the Respondent and Bar Counsel of the District Committee's Determination.
(9) Notice to Complainant: -
(a) If the Subcommittee has dismissed the Complaint or the District Committee
has dismissed the Charges of Misconduct, the District Committee Chairman by
mail shall promptly and simultaneously notify the Complainant, the Respondent
and Bar Counsel of such dismissal and the factual and legal bases thereof.
(b) If the Subcommittee or District Committee determines to issue a private or
public reprimand, with or without Terms, or a dismissal upon Terms, then upon
expiration of the period
for appeal, if any, the District Committee Chairman shall promptly send the
Complainant a copy of the District Committee's Determination. If the Respondent
appeals the District Committee's Determination as provided in this rule, the
District Committee Chairman shall promptly notify the Complainant of the
District Committee's Determination and Respondent's demand for review by the
Board. If the Respondent fails to comply with the Terms imposed by the
Subcommittee or District Committee, the District Committee Chairman shall
notify the Complainant upon imposition of the alternative disposition. If the
Subcommittee or District Committee determines to certify the matter to the
Board, the District Committee Chairman shall mail a copy of the District
Committee Determination to the Complainant simultaneously with the mailing of
the District Committee Determination to the Respondent.
(10) Appeal from District Committee's Determination: -
(a) A Respondent as to whom a District Committee has determined to issue a
private or public reprimand or to impose Terms,
within ten days after notice thereof, may demand an appeal by filing with the
Clerk of the Disciplinary System either a notice of appeal or a written demand
that further proceedings be conducted pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 39 of
Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia. In either case, a copy shall be sent to the
District Committee Chairman and to Bar Counsel.
(b) When proceeding by notice of appeal or a written demand that further
proceedings be conducted pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 39 of Title 54.1 of
the Code of Virginia, the Respondent shall certify in the notice of appeal or
written demand that he or she has ordered from the court reporter the
transcript of the proceedings before the District Committee, at the
Respondent's cost. Upon receipt of such notice or written demand by the Clerk
of the Disciplinary System, the imposition of any reprimand or term shall be
stayed. No appeal shall lie from any
sanction to which the Respondent has agreed. Upon receipt of notice of appeal
or written demand, Bar Counsel shall forward those portions of the Record in
his or her possession to the Clerk. The transcript is a part of the record when
it is received in the office of the Clerk of the Disciplinary System within 40
days after filing of the notice of appeal or written demand. The Clerk shall
retain the Record until the transcript has been received or for 40 days after
the notice of appeal or written demand has been received, whichever first
occurs, and shall then dispose of the Record as provided in subparagraph D of
this rule in case of an appeal to the Disciplinary Board and as provided by
subparagraph (c) below in case of an appeal to a three-judge court. Failure of
the Respondent to make the transcript a part of the Record as specified herein
shall result in dismissal of the appeal by the Disciplinary Board, whether
initiated by notice of
appeal or written demand, and affirmance of the sanction imposed by the
District Committee. Bar Counsel shall initiate the three-judge court process
for the appeal only after receipt of the transcript by the Clerk of the
Disciplinary System.
(c) When proceeding by written demand that further proceedings be conducted
pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 39 of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia, such
proceeding shall be conducted before a duly convened three-judge court as an
appeal on the Record pursuant to the same procedure for an appeal before the
Board under subparagraph D herein, except that all such proceedings shall be
public. The Clerk of the Disciplinary System shall forward the Record to the
Clerk of the designated Circuit Court only upon receipt of the transcript as
provided in subparagraph (b) above. References in subparagraph D of this rule
to
"Clerk" or
"Clerk of the Disciplinary System" shall mean the
Clerk of the designated Circuit Court when appropriate, and to
"Board" shall mean the three-judge court.
(11) Issuance of Reprimand: - Upon the expiration of the period for appeal of a
reprimand, if notice of appeal has not been given by the Respondent, the
District Committee shall issue the reprimand to the Respondent and, if the
reprimand is a public reprimand, Bar Counsel shall issue a public statement
thereof as provided in the Rules of Procedure adopted by Council.
(12) Certification to the Board: - If the Subcommittee has elected to certify
the Complaint or the District Committee has elected to certify the Charges of
Misconduct to the Board, it will promptly mail to the Clerk of the Disciplinary
System a statement of the certified charges which shall include sufficient
facts to reasonably notify Bar Counsel and the Respondent of the basis for such
certification and the Disciplinary Rules alleged to have been violated.
C. The Board and Procedure Before the Board. -
(1) Appointment: - The Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court shall appoint, after consultation with the Council, twenty
members of the Board, sixteen of whom shall be members of the Bar and four of
whom shall be lay persons. One member shall be designated by the Chief Justice
as Chairman and two members as Vice-Chairmen. Members shall serve staggered
terms of three years each. No member shall serve more than two consecutive
three year terms but shall be eligible for reappointment after the lapse of one
or more years following expiration of the previous three year term. Provided,
however, that in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1994, when the membership of
the Board was expanded by six, from fourteen to twenty members, the additional
six members shall be appointed as follows: two members of the Bar for one year
terms, two members of the Bar for two year terms, and
two lay persons for three year terms. At the expiration of the initial term of
any member so appointed for less than a three year term, such member shall be
eligible for immediate reappointment to the Board for two additional
consecutive three year terms.
(2) Notice of Meetings; Quorum: - The Board shall meet on reasonable notice by
the Chairman, or a Vice-Chairman. Five members shall constitute a quorum and
the action of a majority of a quorum shall constitute action of the Board. One
of the five members assigned to any proceeding shall be a non-lawyer. If the
scheduled non-lawyer member is unable to attend and if an alternate non-lawyer
member is not reasonably available, participation by a non-lawyer member shall
not be required in any proceeding if a quorum is otherwise present.
(3) Jurisdiction: - The
Board shall have jurisdiction to consider:
(a) Complaints and Charges of Misconduct certified to it by a Subcommittee or a
District Committee, respectively;
(b) conviction of a Crime;
(c) disability proceedings;
(d) disbarment or suspension in another jurisdiction;
(e) any petition from Bar Counsel or the chairman of a District Committee as
provided in subparagraph (5)(b) hereof;
(f) appeals from reprimands or Terms imposed by District Committees;
(g) petitions for
reinstatement referred to it by this Court;
(h) violations of the Virginia Consumer Real Estate Settlement Protection Act
or any regulations adopted pursuant thereto; and
(i) the failure of a Respondent to make a transcript part of the Record as
provided in subparagraph B.(10)(b) of this Paragraph 13.
(4) Powers of the Board: - The Board shall have the power:
(a) to adopt such rules and regulations not inconsistent herewith as may be
convenient
for the conduct of its business;
(b) on its own motion or upon request by Bar Counsel or the Respondent, to
summon and examine witnesses under oath administered by any member of the Board
and to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents
necessary or material to any proceeding; any summons or subpoena may be issued
by any member of the Board or the Clerk of the Disciplinary System and shall
have the force of a summons or subpoena issued by a circuit court; and
(c) to rule on the admissibility of evidence.
(5) Procedure on Certification to the Board: -
(a) Whenever a matter is certified to the Board by a Subcommittee or a District
Committee the Charge of Misconduct shall be served on the Respondent and the
Board shall set a time and place for hearing and shall serve notice upon the
Respondent at least twenty-one days prior to the date fixed for the hearing.
The Respondent may, within twenty-one days after such service:
(i) file his answer which shall be conclusively deemed to be a consent to the
jurisdiction of the Board; or
(ii) file a demand that the proceedings before the Board be terminated and that
further proceedings be conducted pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 39 of Title
54.1 of the Code of Virginia, whereupon further proceedings before the Board
shall be terminated and Bar Counsel shall file the complaint required by
54.1-3935 of the Code.
The Respondent shall have the right to representation by counsel, to examine
and cross-examine witnesses, and to present evidence in his own behalf.
(b) The testimony shall be taken and preserved, together with all exhibits or
copies thereof received in evidence or refused by the Board.
(i) If Bar Counsel or a District Committee Chairman has reasonable cause to
believe that an
Attorney is engaging in Misconduct which is likely to result in injury to, or loss of
property of,
one or more of the
Attorney's clients or any other person, and that the continued practice of law by the
Attorney poses an imminent danger to the public, Bar Counsel or the District Committee
Chairman may petition the Board to issue an order requiring the
Attorney to appear before the Board for a hearing in accordance with the procedures set
forth below.
(ii) The petition shall be under oath and shall set forth the nature of the
alleged Misconduct, the factual basis for the belief that immediate action by
the Board is reasonable and necessary, and any other facts which may be
relevant to the Board's consideration of the matter, including any prior
disciplinary record of the
Attorney.
(iii) Upon receipt of the petition, the Chairman or a Vice-Chairman of the
Board shall issue an order requiring the Respondent to appear before the Board
not less than 14 nor more than 30 days from the date of the order for a hearing
to
determine whether the Misconduct has occurred and the imposition of sanctions
is appropriate. The Board's order shall be served on the Respondent no fewer
than ten days prior to the date set for hearing.
(iv) If the Respondent, at the time the petition is received by the Board, is
the subject of an order then in effect by a circuit court pursuant to 54.1-3936
of the Code of Virginia appointing a receiver for his accounts, the Board shall
issue a further order summarily suspending the license of the Respondent until
the Board enters its order upon such hearing.
(v) At least five days prior to the date set for hearing, the Respondent shall
either (a) file a formal answer to the petition which shall be conclusively
deemed to be a consent to the jurisdiction of the Board or (b) file a demand
that proceedings before the Board be terminated and that further proceedings be
conducted pursuant to Article 6 of
Chapter 39 of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia, whereupon further proceedings
before the Board shall be terminated and Bar Counsel shall file a complaint
under 54.1-3935 of the Code. Failure to file such demand within the time
prescribed herein shall be a conclusive waiver of the right to subsequently
file such demand.
(vi) If proceedings continue before the Board, the conduct of the hearing shall
be as provided in subsection (a) of this section 5. If proceedings continue
pursuant to 54.1-3935 of the Code, the court designated pursuant to that
section shall conduct the hearing provided for therein not more than 60 days
from the date of filing of the complaint. If any order of summary suspension
has been entered, such suspension shall remain in effect until the court
designated under 54.1-3935 of the Code enters a final order disposing of the
issues before it.
(6) Determination by Board: - At the
conclusion of the evidence of the Bar and at the conclusion of all the
evidence, a motion to strike the evidence of the Bar as to some or all charges
may be made on behalf of the Respondent. If the motion is sustained, those
charges not supported by the evidence shall be dismissed. If the Board
determines that the evidence fails to show Misconduct it shall dismiss the
proceeding.
Upon a finding of Misconduct, the Board shall enter and serve upon the
Respondent its memorandum order, setting forth:
(a) brief findings of the facts established by the evidence;
(b) the nature of the Misconduct shown by the facts so established;
(c) the sanction imposed, which shall be:
(i) dismissal with Terms;
(ii) issuance of an admonition, with or without Terms;
(iii) issuance of a public reprimand, with or without Terms;
(iv) suspension of the license of the Respondent for a stated period of time
not in excess of five years, provided, however, that an
attorney whose license has been suspended for more than
one (1) year must apply for
reinstatement as provided in Paragraph J, infra; or (v) revocation of the Respondent's
license;
(d) the effective date of the sanction imposed; and
(e) the name and address of the court reporter who served at the hearing.
At the close of the hearing before the Board, if the Board determines that the
Respondent has engaged in Misconduct and that the continued practice of law by
the
Attorney constitutes an imminent danger to the public, the Board may enter a summary
order immediately suspending or revoking the license of the
Attorney. In those cases, the Board shall, in addition to the summary order and within a
reasonable time after the hearing, enter and serve upon the Respondent its
memorandum order setting forth the information described in subsections (a)
through and including (e) above.
If the Board finds that the Misconduct was the result of a Disability, it may
consider the Disability in mitigation of any
discipline imposed, and if the Board finds that the Disability exists at the
time of the hearing, it shall dispose of the matter in the manner provided in
Subparagraph F below. The Board may refuse to accept evidence of Disability if
the Respondent has not raised the issue in his answer or has not provided to
Bar Counsel at least thirty days prior to the hearing date copies of any
reports of health care practitioners which the Respondent intends to introduce
into evidence.
In any case where Terms are included in the disposition, the Board shall
specify the time period within which compliance shall be completed and the
alternative disposition in the event the Terms are not complied with. Bar
Counsel shall be responsible for monitoring compliance with Terms and reporting
any noncompliance to the Board. If the Respondent fails to comply with the
Terms within the stated time period, as determined by the Board, the
alternative disposition shall be imposed.
D. Proceedings Upon
Appeal of a District Committee Determination. -
(1) Upon receipt of notice from the Clerk that a Respondent has filed an Appeal
from a District Committee Determination, the Board shall place such matter on
its docket for review. The Clerk shall notify the Respondent when the entire
Record of the proceedings before the District Committee has been received or
when 40 days from receipt of the notice of appeal has expired. The Record shall
consist of the notice of hearing, the transcript of testimony (if any), any
exhibits received or refused by the District Committee, the District Committee
Determination, and all briefs, memoranda or other papers filed with the
District Committee by the Respondent or the Bar. Upon petition of the
Respondent, for good cause shown, the Board may permit the Record to be
supplemented to prevent injustice, such supplement to be in such form as the
Board may deem appropriate. Thereafter, briefs shall be filed as follows:
(a) The Respondent shall file an opening brief
in the office of the Clerk of the Disciplinary System within 40 days after the
filing by the Clerk of notice to the Respondent regarding the Record.
(b) The Bar shall file its brief in the office of the Clerk of the Disciplinary
System within 25 days after filing of the opening brief.
(c) The Respondent may file a reply brief within 14 days after filing of the
Bar's brief.
Failure of the Respondent to file an opening brief within the time specified
herein shall result in the dismissal of the appeal and affirmance of the
sanction imposed by the District Committee.
(2) Standard of Review: - The Standard for review by the Board shall be the
same as is provided in 9-6.14:17 of the Code of Virginia for review of
administrative agency decisions.
(3) Oral argument: - Oral argument shall be granted unless waived by the
Respondent.
(4) Imposition of
Sanctions: - Upon review of the Record in its entirety, the Board may:
(a) dismiss the Charges of Misconduct upon a finding that the District
Committee Determination is contrary to the law or is not supported by
substantial evidence; or
(b) affirm the District Committee Determination, in which instance the Board
may impose the same or lesser sanction as that imposed by the District
Committee, but in no case shall it increase the severity of the Sanction
imposed by the District Committee.
E. Proceedings Upon Adjudication of a Crime. -
(1) Summary Suspension: - Whenever the Clerk of the Disciplinary System
receives written notification from any court of competent jurisdiction stating
that an
Attorney has been found guilty of a Crime by verdict of a judge or jury, irrespective
of whether sentencing has occurred, the Board shall forthwith enter an order
summarily suspending the license of the
Attorney and shall forthwith serve upon the
Attorney (a) a copy of the written notification from the court, (b) a copy of the
Board's order, and (c) a notice fixing the time and place of a hearing to
determine whether the license of the
Attorney should be revoked or further suspended. The hearing shall be set not less than
fourteen nor more than thirty days after the date of the Board's order. Upon
written request of the Respondent, the hearing shall be continued until after
sentencing has occurred, and on receipt by the Board of a certified copy of a
notice of appeal from the conviction, proceedings before the Board shall, upon
request of the Respondent, be continued pending disposition of such appeal. The
Board may, upon request of the Respondent, hold an interim hearing and
terminate such suspension during the pendency of such sentencing or appeal if
it finds that such suspension, if not terminated, would be likely to exceed the
discipline imposed by the Board upon a hearing on the merits of the case.
Upon presentation to the Board of a certified copy of an order setting aside
the verdict or reversing the conviction on appeal, any suspension of the
license shall be automatically terminated and any revocation of the license
shall be vacated, and the license shall be deemed automatically reinstated.
Nothing herein shall preclude further proceedings against the Respondent upon
Charges of Misconduct arising from the facts leading to such conviction.
(2) Action By the Board: - If the Board shall find at the hearing that the
Respondent has been found guilty of a Crime by the verdict of a judge or jury,
an order shall be issued and served upon the Respondent in which the Board
shall:
(a) Suspend, or continue the suspension of, the license of the Respondent for a
stated period not in excess of five years; or
(b) Revoke the license of the Respondent.
(3) Procedure: - The procedure applicable to hearings relating to Misconduct
shall apply to hearings relating to a Crime,
except that if the
Attorney elects to have further proceedings conducted pursuant to Article 6, Chapter
39, Title 54.1 of the Code, he shall file his demand therefor not later than
ten days prior to the date set for the hearing. In the event the
Attorney files a demand that the Proceedings before the Board be terminated, and that
further proceedings be conducted by a three-judge Circuit Court, the order of
the Board suspending the license of the
Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the conclusion of the hearing
conducted by the three-judge court, at which time said Court shall deal with
the order of suspension as part of its ruling; subject, however, to the
provisions of 54.1-3935 of the Code of Virginia.
F. Disability. - (1) Burden of Proof: - Whenever the existence of a Disability
is alleged in a proceeding under this Rule for the suspension of the license of
an
Attorney or in mitigation of
Charges of Misconduct, the burden of proving such Disability shall rest with
the party asserting its existence. The issue of Disability may be raised by any
person at any time and if a District Committee or the Disciplinary Board,
during the course of hearing Charges of Misconduct against a Respondent,
believes that the Respondent may then be suffering from a Disability, the
District Committee or the Disciplinary Board may postpone the hearing and
initiate Disability proceedings under this Rule. In proceedings to terminate a
suspension for Disability, the burden of proving the termination of Disability
shall be on the
Attorney.
(2) Suspension for Disability: - The Board shall have the Power to suspend the
license of an
Attorney who is under a Disability. The term of such suspension shall be indefinite,
and except as provided in (6)(a) below shall be terminated only upon
determination by the Board that the Disability no longer exists. A finding of
Disability shall not
terminate any proceeding upon Charges of Misconduct involving the Respondent,
but may be considered by the Board in mitigation as provided in Subsection C
(6).
(3) Investigation and Summary Suspension: -
(a) Suspension upon Proof of Prior Adjudication of, or Hospitalization for,
Disability. Upon receipt of a notice from the Clerk of the Disciplinary System
with supporting documentary evidence that an
Attorney has been adjudicated by a Court of competent jurisdiction to suffer from
Disability, or that the
Attorney has been involuntarily admitted to a hospital (as defined in 37.1-1 of the
Code of Virginia) for treatment of any addiction, inebriacy, insanity or mental
illness, the Board shall enter an order suspending the license of the
Attorney and serve the order on the
Attorney.
(b) Suspension in Absence of Prior Adjudication of, or Hospitalization for,
Disability. Upon receipt of notice or evidence that an
Attorney is or may be suffering from Disability and in the absence of prior
adjudication of or
hospitalization for Disability, Bar Counsel shall cause an investigation to be
made to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the
Disability exists. If Bar Counsel determines that there is probable cause to
believe that the
Attorney suffers Disability, he shall file a petition with the Board, which shall
promptly hold a hearing to determine whether such Disability exists. A copy of
the petition shall be served on the
Attorney.
(4) Hearing Procedure: - The Board shall conduct a hearing to determine whether
a Disability exists in the following instances:
(a) Upon petition of Bar Counsel or a District Committee alleging that an
Attorney is under a Disability.
(b) Upon petition of an
Attorney who has been suspended from practice for Disability and who alleges that the
Disability no longer exists. Evidence that the
Attorney is no longer hospitalized as provided in (3)(a) above shall not be conclusive
to the Board's determination of the
Attorney's
ability to resume the practice of law.
(5) General Provisions: - The following additional provisions apply to
Disability hearings:
(a) Guardian Ad Litem. - The notice of any hearing to determine whether an
Attorney suffers from Disability shall request the
Attorney to advise the Board whether he has retained counsel to represent him at the
hearing. Unless counsel for the
Attorney enters an appearance with the Board within ten (10) days of the date of the
notice, the Board shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the
Attorney at the hearing.
(b) Examination. - The Board may require the
Attorney to undergo a psychiatric, physical or other medical examination by a qualified
physician selected by the Board. A written report of the results of such
examination, along with written reports from any other physicians who have
examined the
Attorney, may be considered as evidence by the Board.
(6) Termination of Suspension: -
(a) In cases where a suspension
for Disability is based upon an adjudication of Disability by a Court, as
provided in (3)(a) above, upon receipt of documentary evidence of adjudication
by a Court of competent jurisdiction that the
Attorney's Disability has terminated, the Board shall promptly enter an order terminating
the suspension of the
Attorney's license.
(b) In all other cases the Board shall hold a hearing on the issue of
termination of the Disability promptly upon receipt of a request from the
Attorney.
G. Disbarment or Suspension in Another Jurisdiction. - Whenever there shall be
filed with the Clerk of the Disciplinary System evidence that an
Attorney admitted to practice in this State has been disbarred or suspended from
practice in another jurisdiction and that such disciplinary action has become
final, the Board shall forthwith enter an order suspending the license of the
Attorney and directing the
Attorney to show cause why the same sanction that was imposed in the other jurisdiction
should
not be imposed by the Board. The Board shall forthwith serve upon the
Respondent by certified mail (a) a copy of such certificate, (b) a copy of such
order, and (c) a notice fixing the time and place of a hearing to determine
what action should be taken by the Board. The hearing shall be set not less
than twenty-one nor more than thirty days after the date of the order. Within
fourteen days of the date of mailing, the Respondent shall file a written
response, which shall be confined to allegations that:
(1) the record of the proceeding in the other jurisdiction would clearly show
that such proceeding was so lacking in notice or opportunity to be heard as to
constitute a denial of due process; or
(2) the imposition by the Board of the same discipline upon the same proof
would result in a grave injustice; or
(3) the same conduct would not be ground for
disciplinary action or for the same discipline in this State.
The Respondent shall have the burden of producing the record upon which he
relies to support allegations (1), (2), or (3) above, and he shall be limited
at the hearing to reliance upon the allegations of his written response. Except
to the extent the allegations of the Respondent's written response are
established, the findings in the other jurisdiction shall be conclusive of all
matters for purposes of the proceeding before the Board.
If at the time fixed for hearing the Respondent has not filed a written
response or shall not appear or if the Board, after hearing, shall determine
that the Respondent has failed to establish the allegations of his written
response, the Board shall impose the same discipline that was imposed in the
other jurisdiction. If the Board shall determine that the Respondent has
established the allegations of his written response, it shall, in its
discretion, dismiss the proceeding or impose a lesser discipline than was
imposed in the other
jurisdiction. A copy of any order imposing sanction shall be served upon the
Respondent by certified mail. Any such order shall be final and binding subject
only to appeal as hereinafter provided.
H. Appeal. - (1) Right: - As a matter of right any Respondent may appeal to
this Court from an order of public reprimand, suspension, or disbarment imposed
by the Board. An appeal shall lie once the memorandum order described in
Paragraph 13C(6), supra, has been served on the Respondent. No appeal shall lie
from a summary order.
(2) Notice of Appeal: - The Respondent shall file with the Clerk of the
Disciplinary System a notice of appeal and assignments of error within thirty
days after the memorandum order of the Board is served on him. This action
within the time prescribed is jurisdictional.
(3) Further Proceedings: - Further proceedings shall be as provided in this
Court's procedure for
filing an appeal from a trial court and procedure following perfection of
appeal. For the purposes of determining dates of filing, the date of filing the
record with the clerk of this Court shall be deemed to be the date of the
issuance of the certificate of the Clerk of this Court under Rule 5:23. The
Clerk of the Disciplinary System of the Virginia State Bar shall immediately
notify the Respondent and his counsel, if any, by certified mail, of the date
on which the record is filed.
(4) Determination: - This Court shall hear the case and make such determination
in connection therewith as it shall deem right and proper.
(5) Office of the
Attorney General: - In all appeals to this Court, the Office of the
Attorney General, or the Bar Counsel, if so requested by the
Attorney General, shall represent the interests of the Commonwealth and its citizens as
appellees.
(6) Stay Pending Appeal: - Upon the entry by the Board of either a summary or
memorandum order of suspension, this Court may, upon petition of the
Respondent, stay the effect of such an order of suspension prior to or during
the pendency of the appeal. Any order of public reprimand shall be
automatically stayed prior to or during the pendency of an appeal therefrom. No
stay shall be granted in cases where the Respondent's license to practice law
has been revoked by either the summary or memorandum order of the Board.
I. (Effective January 1, 2001) Resignation. Any
Attorney may at any time surrender his license by tendering his notarized resignation
in writing to the Clerk of this Court or the Clerk of the Disciplinary System,
but any resignation tendered by an
Attorney at a time when charges are pending against him before the Board, or a District
Committee, or a Court, shall be deemed an admission that such charges are true.
This admission shall not be deemed an admission in any proceeding except one
relating to the status of the
Attorney as a member of the Virginia State Bar. This Court or the Board will
by order accept such resignation and revoke the license of such
Attorney. Upon acceptance of such resignation by this Court or the Board, Bar Counsel,
in his discretion, may dismiss without prejudice any and all files of Charges
of Misconduct then pending by notification of such action to the Clerk of the
Disciplinary System and the Committee, Court or Board wherein the case lies.
Upon tendering his resignation to this Court or the Board, the
Attorney shall immediately cease the practice of law and shall comply with the notice
requirements set forth in Paragraph K(1), infra.
J.
Reinstatement. - (1)
Reinstatement After Revocation. - Any
Attorney whose license has been revoked may petition this Court for
reinstatement, setting forth in his or her petition the reasons he or she should be
reinstated. The following requirements shall apply: (1) the petition shall be
filed under oath or affirmation with penalty of perjury; (2) no petition may be
filed sooner than five years from the effective
date of the revocation; and (3) the
Attorney must certify in the petition that he or she has met the requirements of the
following subparagraph. This Court may deny the petition or refer it to the
Board for recommendation. Upon such reference, the Board shall hold a hearing
and file its recommendation, together with the record before it, with the Clerk
of this Court. The Board may recommend approval or disapproval of the petition.
Final action will be taken by this Court.
No license to practice law shall be reinstated for any revoked
Attorney unless the
Attorney demonstrates to the Board that he or she (1) within five (5) years of filing
the petition has attended sixty (60) hours of continuing legal education of
which at least ten (10) shall be in the area of legal ethics or
professionalism, and has taken the Multistate Professional Responsibility
Examination and received a scaled score of 85 or higher; (2) has reimbursed the
Bar's Clients' Protection Fund for any
sums of money it may have paid as a result of the
Attorney's misconduct; and (3) has paid the Bar all costs that have been assessed against
him or her, together with any interest due thereon.
In addition to meeting the foregoing requirements, an
Attorney whose license to practice law was revoked must also show by clear and
convincing evidence that he or she is a person of honest demeanor and good
moral character and possesses the requisite fitness to practice law.
The filing by an
Attorney of a petition for
reinstatement shall constitute a waiver of all confidentiality relating to the petition, and
to the Complaint or Complaints that resulted in, or were pending at the time
of, the revocation of the
Attorney's license.
Upon approval of a Petition by this Court, the revoked
Attorney shall meet the following requirements prior to and as a condition of his or
her
reinstatement: (1) take and pass the written portion of the Virginia State Bar examination;
(2) if required by the Board, obtain and maintain a
professional liability insurance policy issued by a company authorized to write
such insurance in Virginia at the cost of the
Attorney in an amount and for such term as are set by the Board; and (3) if required by
the Board, obtain and maintain a blanket fidelity bond or dishonesty insurance
policy issued by a company authorized to write such bonds or insurance in
Virginia at the cost of the
Attorney in an amount and for such term as are set by the Board.
(2)
Reinstatement After Suspension for More than One Year. - No license to practice law shall be
reinstated for any
Attorney whose license has been suspended for more than one year unless the
Attorney demonstrates to the Board that he or she (1) has attended twelve hours of
continuing legal education, of which at least two hours shall be in the area of
legal ethics or professionalism, for every year or fraction thereof that the
Attorney's license has been suspended; (2) has taken the Multistate Professional
Responsibility Examination since imposition of discipline and received a scaled
score of 85 or higher; (3) has reimbursed the Bar's Clients' Protection Fund
for any sums of money it may have paid as a result of the
Attorney's misconduct; and (4) has paid to the Bar all costs that have been assessed
against him or her, together with any interest due thereon.
(3) The requirements of this subparagraph J shall apply to all petitions filed
after July 1, 2000.
K. General Provisions. - (1) Duties of Disbarred or Suspended
Attorney: - Any attorney who is disbarred or suspended as a result of a proceeding under this paragraph
13 shall forthwith give notice, by certified mail, of his disbarment or
suspension to all clients for whom he is currently handling matters and to all
opposing
attorneys and the presiding judges in pending litigation. The
Attorney shall also make appropriate arrangements for the disposition of
matters then in his care in conformity with the wishes of his client. The
Attorney shall give such notice within fourteen (14) days of the effective date of the
disbarment or suspension order, and make such arrangements as are required
herein within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the disbarment or
suspension order. The
Attorney shall also furnish proof to the bar within sixty (60) days of the effective
date of the disbarment or suspension order that such notices have been timely
given and such arrangements for the disposition of matters made. Issues
concerning the adequacy of the notice and arrangements required herein shall be
determined by the Disciplinary Board, which may impose a sanction of revocation
or suspension for failure to comply with the requirements of this subparagraph.
(2) Authority of Judge: - Every Judge shall have authority to take such action
as may be necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of clients of any
Attorney who is disbarred or suspended.
(3) Enforcement: - Every Circuit Court
shall have power to enforce any order, summons or subpoena issued by the Board,
a District Committee or Bar Counsel and to adjudge disobedience thereof as
contempt.
NOTES:
Cross references. -- As to transmittal to House and Senate Committees for
Courts of Justice of evidence in the possession of the Virginia State Bar
relating to pending disciplinary proceedings involving a licensed
attorney being considered for election as a judge, see
§ 54.1-3911. As to proceedings pending disciplinary action, see
§ 54.1-3936.
Editor's note. -- Amendments to former paragraphs 13(c) and 13(d) of Section IV
are published at 202 Va. lxi (1961). Amendments to paragraphs 13G(6) and 13J(5)
are published at
221 Va. 381 (1980). Paragraph 13B(1)(d) was amended in 1981 (see
221 Va. 1147). Paragraphs 13A(9), 13D(1), 13D(2) and 13D(3) were amended effective July 1,
1983. Additional amendments to paragraph 13 are published at
210 Va. 411 (1970); 211 Va. cxxxiii (1971); and
217 Va. 173 (1976).
The amendments, effective January 23, 1995, adopted January 23, 1995, in
subdivision C(1), in the first sentence, substituted
"twenty" for
"fourteen," substituted
"sixteen" for
"twelve," and substituted
"four" for
"two," substituted
"two members as Vice-Chairmen" for
"another as Vice-Chairman" at the end of the second sentence, inserted
"three year" following
"two consecutive" in the third sentence, and added the final two sentences; substituted
"a Vice-Chairman" for
"the Vice-Chairman" at the end of the first sentence of subdivision C(2); in subdivision C(5)(b),
added the introductory paragraph, and in the first sentence of subdivision
(iii), substituted
"a Vice-Chairman" for
"Vice Chairman" and inserted
"the" preceding
"date of the order"; and
rewrote subdivision K(5).
The amendment, effective May 4, 1995, adopted May 4, 1995, rewrote subdivision
K(5)(c).
The amendment, effective July 1, 1995, adopted May 1, 1995, in subdivision
C(10), added the subdivision (a) designation, and in subdivision C(10)(a), in
the first sentence, substituted
"by filing with the Clerk of the Disciplinary System either a notice of appeal or" for
"either by filing" and deleted
"or by giving notice of an appeal to the District Committee Chairman with a copy
to the Clerk of the Disciplinary System and to Bar Counsel" at the end of the sentence; substituted the present second, third and fourth
sentences for the former second sentence which referred to the consequences and
disposition of the notice of appeal as provided in subdivision D; and added
subdivision C(10)(b); and in subdivision
D(1), in the introductory paragraph, in the second sentence, inserted
"entire" preceding
"Record of the proceedings" and substituted
"has been received or when 40 days from receipt of the notice of appeal has
expired" for
"is received" at the end of the sentence; inserted
"the" preceding
"District Committee Determination" in the third sentence; and added
"by the Clerk of notice to the Respondent regarding the Record" at the end of subdivision D(1)(a).
The amendment, effective September 15, 1995, adopted September 15, 1995, in
subdivision A, inserted
"and 'Private Reprimand' means a determination by a District Committee" in the paragraph defining
"Admonition," added the paragraph defining
"Public Reprimand" and inserted
"an Admonition, or" in the paragraph defining
"Terms"; and in subdivision K, inserted
"investigation" in subdivision K(5), inserted
"Virginia State Bar staff member or component of" in subdivision
K(5)(a), in subdivision K(5)(b), inserted
"disciplinary or related criminal" and deleted
"or a related criminal investigation" at the end, added present subdivision K(5)(d), redesignated former
subdivisions K(5)(d) through K(5)(f) as present subdivisions K(5)(e) through
K(5)(g), in present subdivision K(5)(e), substituted
"three-judge Circuit Court, or the Board imposing a" for
"Board or three-judge Circuit Court relating to" and substituted
"to the Clerk of each Circuit Court, General District Court and Juvenile and
Domestic Relations District Court" for
"each Circuit Court and General District Court," inserted
"private" in present subdivision K(5)(f), deleted
"generally" preceding
"known to the public" in the third sentence of
present subdivision K(5)(g), substituted
"subparagraph (e)" for
"subparagraph (d)" in present subdivision K(5)(g)(v) and added subdivision K(5)(h).
The amendment, effective April 24, 1996, adopted April 24, 1996, in subdivision
A, substituted
"a District Committee member appointed by the District Committee Chairman to act" for
"the District Committee or Panel Chairman or other Committee or Panel officer
acting" in clause (i) of the definition of
"Subcommittee"; in subdivision B(2)(d), added the second sentence, substituted
"shall become" for
"shall constitute" following
"Paragraph 13" in the present fourth sentence, substituted
"persons" for
"members and the action of a majority of a quorum shall be the action of the
District Committee or Panel" at the end of the present fifth sentence,
added the present sixth sentence, added
"If the scheduled non-lawyer person is unable to attend, and if an alternate
non-lawyer is not reasonably available" at the beginning of the present seventh sentence, deleted
"any" preceding
"proceeding" in the present seventh sentence, and added the present eighth sentence; in
subdivision B(5)(b), added
"and provided further that a respondent, within ten days of the issuance of the
dismissal, may request a hearing before the District Committee whenever the
dismissal creates a 'Disciplinary Record,' as that term is defined in /P13.A.,
supra" at the end of clause (ii) and added
"provided, however, that in no case shall a member of the Subcommittee which
considered the Charges of Misconduct sit on the District Committee Panel which
hears the Charges of Misconduct" at the end of the first sentence in clause (v); in subdivision B(6)(b),
substituted
"witnesses" for
"exhibits" at the end of the second sentence and deleted the former sixth sentence which
read
"Members of a Subcommittee may participate in the hearing process and vote on
the disposition of the Charges of Misconduct"; in subdivision C(2), added the present third sentence, and inserted
"If the scheduled non-lawyer member is unable to attend and if an alternate
non-lawyer member is not reasonably available" at the beginning of the fourth sentence, and substituted
"a non-lawyer member" for
"nonlawyer members" following
"participation by" in the fourth sentence; and in subdivision K(9)(a), deleted
"In any proceeding before a District Committee, the Board or a court on a Charge
of Misconduct" at the beginning and added
"at any stage involving a Charge of Misconduct" at the end of the introductory paragraph, and substituted
"Council" for
"Executive Committee" preceding
"of the bar" in clause (i).
The
amendment, effective January 13, 1997, adopted January 13, 1997, substituted
"Complaint" for
"Charge of Misconduct" throughout the rule, in subdivision A, rewrote the definition of
"Charge of Misconduct" which formerly read:
"the notice given by the bar to the Respondent, setting forth the Misconduct
alleged to have been committed by the Respondent, and the disciplinary rules
alleged to have been violated" and added the definition for
"Complaint"; in subdivision B, in subdivision B(5), added the catchline, added
subdivisions B(5)(a) and B(5)(b), and redesignated former subdivision B(5) as
present subdivision B(5)(c), inserted
"called the Charge of Misconduct throughout the remainder of this /P13" following
"The notice" in the second sentence in subdivision B(6)(a), substituted
"has dismissed the Complaint or the" for
"or" following
"If the Subcommittee" in subdivision B(9)(a),
in subdivision B(12)(a), substituted
"has elected to certify the Complaint or the" for
"or" following
"If the Subcommittee" and substituted
"for such certification" for
"of such Charges" following
"Respondent of the basis"; in subdivision C, in subdivision C(3)(a), added
"Complaints and" at the beginning and added
"respectively" at the end, and in subdivision C(5)(a), inserted
"of a Complaint" following
"by a Subcommittee" and substituted
"certified charges" for
"Charges certified to the Board" at the end of the first sentence; and moved the first paragraph in subdivision
K(9) to follow the catchline for subdivision K(9)(a).
The amendment, effective July 1, 1997, adopted May 2, 1997, in 13(C) added the
second sentence in the second paragraph of subdivision (1); added
"the" after
"notice of"; and added the language beginning
"the costs assessed" at the end of the paragraph.
In the third paragraph of subdivision (10) deleted
"practice of law by the former
attorney." and added
"license to practice law to the former
attorney." at the end.
The amendment, effective July 30, 1997, adopted July 30, 1997, in subdivision
(3) added designation (h); and made minor changes in phraseology in
subdivisions (3)(f) and (g).
The amendment, effective January 27, 1998, adopted January 27, 1998, in
subdivision A, rewrote the paragraph defining
"Disciplinary Record"; and rewrote subdivisions K(1) and K(4).
The amendment, effective September 23, 1998, adopted September 23, 1998, in
subdivision (5), in the first sentence, substituted
"Procedure on Certification to the Board" for
"Procedure on Charges of Misconduct"; and in subdivision (5) (a), rewrote the introductory paragraph which formerly
read:
"Upon certification
by a Subcommittee of a Complaint or a District Committee of a Charge of
Misconduct, Bar Counsel shall cause to be served on the Respondent a statement
of the certified charges. The Respondent may, within twenty-one days after such
service," and deleted the first sentence in the concluding paragraph which formerly
read:
"After the answer has been filed, or the time has expired for either filing an
answer or demanding that the proceeding be terminated, the Board shall set a
time and place for hearing and shall, at least twenty-one days prior to the
date fixed for the hearing, serve notice thereof upon the Respondent."
The amendment effective July 1, 1999, adopted April 23, 1999, in B (2) d,
substituted
"ten, or in the discretion of Council, twenty, thirty or forty members" for
"nine, or in the discretion of Council, eighteen, twenty-seven or thirty-six members" in the first sentence, substituted
"Three members of a ten-member District Committee, six members of a
twenty-member District Committee, nine members of a thirty member District
Committee, and twelve members of a forty-member" for
"Two members of a nine-member District Committee and four members of an
eighteen-member District Committee and six members of a twenty-seven member
District Committee and eight members of a thirty-six member" in the second sentence and substituted
"twenty members or more, ten members" for
"eighteen members or more, nine" in the third sentence; redesignated the last three sentences in subdivision B
(10) (a) as the first three sentences in subdivision B (10) (b) and in
subdivision B (10) (b), inserted
"or written demand" following
"notice of appeal" in the first, second, fourth, fifth and sixth sentences, added
"When proceeding by notice of appeal or a written demand that further
proceedings be conducted pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 39 of Title 54.1 of
the Code of Virginia" in the first sentence, inserted
"by the Clerk of the Disciplinary System, the imposition of any" in the second sentence, inserted
"of" following
"after filing" in the fifth sentence, substituted
"subparagraph (c) below in the case of an appeal to a three-judge court" for
"statute in case of an appeal to the Court" in the sixth sentence, in the seventh sentence, deleted
"Except as provided in Paragraph 13.D.(1)" preceding
"failure of the Respondent" and inserted
"by the Disciplinary Board, whether initiated by notice of appeal or written
demand" and added the last sentence;
inserted subdivision B (10) (c); inserted subdivision C (3) (i); in subdivision
K (10), in the first sentence, inserted
"The Clerk of the Disciplinary system shall assess costs against the Respondent
in the following cases," inserted the subdivision (a) designator, substituted
"All" for
"In a" and deleted
"the Clerk of the Disciplinary System shall assess costs against the Respondent-attorney," in the second sentence, deleted
"The Clerk shall also assess costs in those cases in which the Respondent-attorney," inserted the subdivision (b) designator and inserted
"All cases against a Respondent who," inserted subdivisions (c) and (d), inserted the subdivision (e) designator,
inserted the first sentence in subdivision (e), and in the former third
sentence, inserted
"reasonable costs paid by the Bar to outside experts or consultants" and substituted
"and transcript fees, copying,
mailing and required publication costs" for
"fees, copy costs."
The amendment, effective February 4, 2000, substituted
"Rules of Professional Conduct" for
"Code of Professional Responsibility" throughout the section; in subdivision B (2) (d), in the first sentence,
substituted
"ten" for
"nine," and substituted
"twenty, thrity or forty" for
"eighteen, twenty-seven or thirty-six," rewrote the third sentence, in the fourth sentence, substituted
"twenty" for
"eighteen," and substituted
"ten" for
"nine"; in subdivision K (5) (b), in the second sentence, inserted
"Attorney's disciplinary record or any disciplinary," inserted
"for bar admission or enforcement purposes," deleted
"but" preceding
"only is," and substituted
"Chair" for
"Chairman" twice; rewrote subdivision K (5) (d); in subdivision K (5) (e), 'deleted
"public, and shall be"
following
"revocation shall be"; and in subdivision K (5) (f), inserted
"and its dispositive orders," and deleted
"and appeals of private reprimands or Terms."
The amendment, effective March 29, 2000, inserted
"or the Code of Professional Responsibility" following
"Rules of Professional Conduct" in this rule.
The amendment, effective March 29, 2000, inserted
"or the Code of Professional Responsibility" following
"Rules of Professional Conduct" in this rule.
The amendment, effective July 1, 2000, inserted the paragraph defining
"Revocation" in subdivision A; in subdivision B(5)(c)(ii), substituted
"i." for
"(i)" and
"ii." for
"(ii)" in (d), and in (e), deleted the language following
"before the District Committee," and in the third paragraph of (e), inserted
"(ii)" preceding
"(d)"; in subdivision H(2), substituted
"thirty" for
"twenty-one"; and in subdivision
J, in the first paragraph, inserted
"(1)
Reinstatement After Revocation," and inserted the present second and fifth sentences, inserted the present
second, fourth and fifth paragraphs, and added subdivisions (2) and (3).
The amendment, effective January 1, 2001, adopted October 23, 2000, in
subdivision I, in the first sentence, inserted
"notarized" preceding
"resignation" and substituted
"Board, or a District Committee, or a Court, shall" for
"Board, District Committee, or a Court shall"; and substituted
"Paragraph K(1)" for
"paragraph K.(1)" near the end of the fifth sentence.
Amended December 18, 2000, effective immediately.
Editor's note. -- Many of the cases below were decided under prior law.
Purpose of preliminary investigation. -- A duly constituted committee of the
Virginia State Bar is authorized in any case of alleged unprofessional
conduct by an
attorney, to
"make such preliminary investigation as may be appropriate." Through the medium of such investigation a number of frivolous and groundless
complaints preferred against
attorneys are dismissed. The
attorney involved is thereby spared the embarrassment and the unwarranted publicity
that attends the filing of a formal complaint and a hearing.
Seventh Dist. Comm. v. Gunter, 212 Va. 278, 183 S.E.2d 713 (1971).
Disciplinary proceedings may be conducted administratively or before three
judge court. -- Read together,
§ 54.1-3935 and paragraph 13 vest Bar Counsel and a district committee with the
option of conducting disciplinary proceedings either administratively or before
a three-judge court; there is no due process defect in such an option.
Gunter v. Virginia State Bar ex rel. Seventh Dist. Comm., 241 Va. 186, 399 S.E.2d 820, cert. denied,
500 U.S. 953, 111 S. Ct. 2260, 114 L. Ed. 2d 712 (1991).
District committee may instigate a disciplinary proceeding on its own.
Delk v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 187, 355 S.E.2d 558 (1987).
No
attorney has right to insist proceedings be confined to administrative forum. --
Although an
attorney, like a district committee, is given a right to remove disciplinary proceedings
from the administrative forum to a circuit court, no
attorney has a right to insist that the proceedings be confined to the administrative
forum.
Gunter v. Virginia State Bar ex rel. Seventh Dist. Comm., 241 Va. 186, 399 S.E.2d 820, cert. denied,
500 U.S. 953, 111 S. Ct. 2260, 114 L. Ed. 2d 712 (1991).
Acquittal in a criminal proceeding presents no bar to a disciplinary proceeding
arising out of substantially the same facts. The rationale which underlies this
distinction is that the purpose of the disciplinary proceeding is not to
punish, but to protect the public from unfit members of the bar.
Smolka v. Second Dist. Comm., 224 Va. 161, 295 S.E.2d 267 (1982).
A circuit court's conclusion that an
attorney's offense in removing office equipment from another's business and placing it in
his own law office did not rise above trespass in no way precluded the State
Bar Disciplinary Board from independently examining the matter and reaching a
determination of misconduct.
Smolka v. Second Dist. Comm., 224 Va. 161, 295 S.E.2d 267 (1982).
Jurisdictional requirements of subparagraph B(4) involve venue, not subject-matter jurisdiction. A provision may use the word
"jurisdiction" in the sense that the court has territorial jurisdiction over the subject
matter, meaning that the court is the proper venue.
Smolka v. Second Dist. Comm., 224 Va. 161, 295 S.E.2d 267 (1982).
The use of
"jurisdiction" in subparagraph B(4) establishes the territorial jurisdiction, or venue, of
the district committee. The provision in no way limits the Board's authority to
determine cases of
attorney misconduct.
Smolka v. Second Dist. Comm., 224 Va. 161, 295 S.E.2d 267 (1982).
Under paragraph 13, it is the duty of a district committee to investigate
charges of misconduct against an
attorney when the misconduct occurs in that district or the
attorney resides in or maintains an office in the district. However, this paragraph
establishes venue
rather than subject-matter jurisdiction.
Stith v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 222, 355 S.E.2d 310 (1987).
Failure to timely object to venue in disciplinary action. -- Ordinarily, venue
is waived if the defendant does not make a timely objection. This concept is
implicit in subparagraph C(5).
Smolka v. Second Dist. Comm., 224 Va. 161, 295 S.E.2d 267 (1982).
Under subparagraph C(5), when an
attorney files his answer to a charge of misconduct, he waives his privilege to assert
lack of venue. If he waits until after the adverse decision of the Virginia
State Bar Disciplinary Board to state his objection to venue, his objection is
untimely.
Smolka v. Second Dist. Comm., 224 Va. 161, 295 S.E.2d 267 (1982).
Venue is waived if timely objection is not
made.
Stith v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 222, 355 S.E.2d 310 (1987).
Where
attorney's first objection to venue of record was his motion to dismiss filed with the
disciplinary board, this objection came too late in the disciplinary
proceedings to afford him relief, and the disciplinary board properly overruled
this motion.
Stith v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 222, 355 S.E.2d 310 (1987).
Where
attorney appeared before the district committee on the first complaint and did not
raise objection to the venue, this was equivalent to an express waiver. Where
he did not appear on the second complaint and did no more than communicate by
telephone with a member of the committee, his failure to object either in
person or in writing again waived any objection to venue.
Stith v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 222, 355 S.E.2d 310 (1987).
The
attorney's failure to make a timely demand for a three-judge court constituted a
conclusive waiver of the right to subsequently file such demand.
Wright v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 491, 357 S.E.2d 518, cert. denied,
484 U.S. 930, 108 S. Ct. 300, 98 L. Ed. 2d 259 (1987).
Petition merely repeating untimely venue objection was properly denied. --
Where
attorney filed with the Disciplinary Board a petition for review of its decision and
remand of the case to the Fourth District Committee for a hearing de novo on
the ground that the Fifth District Committee lacked jurisdiction to investigate
the complaints against him, and his petition merely repeated his untimely
objection to venue, the Disciplinary Board did not err in denying it.
Stith v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 222, 355 S.E.2d 310 (1987).
Committee for district to which
attorney improperly removes goods has jurisdiction. -- Where
attorney takes office equipment from one district and uses it in his law office in
another district, the committee for the latter district has jurisdiction to
investigate this misconduct. Larceny is a continuing offense and use of the
equipment by the
attorney in his law office constituted misconduct in the district in which it was
located.
Smolka v. Second Dist. Comm., 224 Va. 161, 295 S.E.2d 267 (1982).
Use of bar funds to pay counsel in suits to enjoin unauthorized practice of
law. -- Payment from bar funds of reasonable counsel fees for the prosecution
of suits on behalf of the Virginia State Bar to enjoin the unauthorized
practice of law is within the authority of the Bar Rules and the Bar Act; but
such
payments shall be limited to
attorneys specially employed for that purpose and only in cases in which special counsel
is requested by the
Attorney General. Button v. Day, 204 Va. 547, 132 S.E.2d 292 (1963).
Attorney's failure to handle a legal matter in a timely fashion and failure to keep his
client reasonably informed as to the status of the matter was misconduct in
violation of subsection (C) of DR 6-101, and the State Bar Disciplinary Board
did not abuse its discretion in ordering disbarment.
Tucker v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 526, 357 S.E.2d 525 (1987).
Sanctions for misconduct. -- Upon finding misconduct proved, the State Bar
Disciplinary Board may (a) deliver a private reprimand; (b) deliver a public
reprimand; (c)
suspend the
attorney's license for a stated period up to five years; or (d) revoke the
attorney's license.
Tucker v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 526, 357 S.E.2d 525 (1987).
Foreign adjudication on merits held conclusive. -- This rule does not permit
the respondent
attorney to relitigate any issues of fact which were expressly or implicitly decided in
the foreign jurisdiction. The board, therefore, correctly held that the foreign
adjudication on the merits was conclusive.
Cummings v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 363, 355 S.E.2d 588 (1987).
Appellate review of Disciplinary Board findings and conclusions. -- On review
the Supreme Court will make an independent examination of the whole record,
giving the factual findings of the Disciplinary Board substantial weight and
viewing them as prima facie correct. While not given the weight of a jury
verdict, those conclusions
will be sustained unless it appears they are not justified by a reasonable view
of the evidence or are contrary to law.
Blue v. Seventh Dist. Comm., 220 Va. 1056, 265 S.E.2d 753, stay denied,
448 U.S. 904, 100 S. Ct. 3045, 65 L. Ed. 2d 1134 (1980).
The penalty imposed by the State Bar Disciplinary Board in a disciplinary
proceeding will be viewed on appeal as prima facie correct and will not be
disturbed unless, upon the Supreme Court's independent examination of the whole
record, it appears unjustified by a reasonable view of the evidence or is
contrary to law.
Tucker v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 526, 357 S.E.2d 525 (1987).
A sanction imposed by the Disciplinary Board will be viewed on appeal as prima
facie correct and will not be disturbed unless, upon independent examination of
the whole record, it appears unjustified by a reasonable view of the evidence
or is contrary to law.
Shea v. Virginia State Bar, 236 Va. 442, 374 S.E.2d 63 (1988).
Applied in
Tucker v. Seventh Dist. Comm., 202 Va. 840, 120 S.E.2d 366 (1961);
Maddy v. First Dist. Comm., 205 Va. 652, 139 S.E.2d 56 (1964);
Blum v. Tenth Dist. Comm., 210 Va. 5, 168 S.E.2d 121 (1969);
Greene v. Virginia State Bar Ass'n, 411 F. Supp. 512 (E.D. Va. 1976).